1 
ahallam 
3232 

2 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 
3 


% 
4 


% Copyright (c) 20032010 by University of Queensland 
5 


% Earth Systems Science Computational Center (ESSCC) 
6 


% http://www.uq.edu.au/esscc 
7 


% 
8 


% Primary Business: Queensland, Australia 
9 


% Licensed under the Open Software License version 3.0 
10 


% http://www.opensource.org/licenses/osl3.0.php 
11 


% 
12 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 
13 



14 


In this chapter we will investigate the effects of a current flow and 
15 


resistivity in a medium. This type of problem is related to the DC resistivity method of 
16 


geophysical prospecting. Currents are injected into the ground at the surface 
17 


and measurements of the potential are taken at various potentialdipole 
18 


locations along or adjacent to the survey line. From these measurements of the 
19 


potential it is possible to infer an approximate apparent resistivity model of 
20 


the subsurface. 
21 



22 


The following theory comes from a tutorial by \citet{Loke2004}. 
23 


We know from Ohm's law that the current flow in the ground is given in vector 
24 


form by 
25 


\begin{equation} 
26 


\vec{J}=\sigma\vec{E} 
27 


\end{equation} 
28 


where $\vec{J}$ is current density, $\vec{E}$ is the electric field intensity 
29 


and $\sigma$ is the conductivity. We can relate the potential to the electric 
30 


field intensity by 
31 


\begin{equation} 
32 


E=\nabla\Phi 
33 


\end{equation} 
34 


where $\Phi$ is the potential. We now note that the current density is related 
35 


to the potential via 
36 


\begin{equation} 
37 


\vec{J}=\sigma\nabla\Phi 
38 


\end{equation} 
39 


Geophysical surveys predominantly use current sources which individually act as 
40 


point poles. Considering our model will contain volumes, we can normalise the 
41 


input current and approximate the current density in a volume $\Delta V$ by 
42 


\begin{equation} 
43 


\nabla \vec{J} = 
44 
jfenwick 
3308 
\left(\frac{I}{\Delta V} \right) \delta(xx_{s}) 
45 


\delta(yy_{s}) 
46 


\delta(zz_{s}) 
47 
ahallam 
3232 
\end{equation} 
48 



49 


\begin{equation} 
50 


\nabla \cdot \left[ \sigma(x,y,z) \nabla \phi (x,y,z) \right] = 
51 
jfenwick 
3308 
\left(\frac{I}{\Delta V} \right) \delta(xx_{s}) 
52 


\delta(yy_{s}) 
53 


\delta(zz_{s}) 
54 
ahallam 
3232 
\end{equation} 
55 



56 


This form is quite simple to solve in \esc. 
57 



58 


\section{3D CurrentDipole Potential} 
59 


\sslist{example11m.py; example11c.py} 
60 



61 


\begin{figure}[ht] 
62 


\centering 
63 


\includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{figures/ex11cstreamline.png} 
64 


\caption{Current Density Model for layered medium.} 
65 


\label{fig:ex11cstream} 
66 


\end{figure} 
67 



68 


\section{Frequency Dependent Resistivity  Induced Polarisation} 
69 


With a more complicated resistivity model it is possible to calculate the 
70 


chargeability or IP effect in the model. A recent development has been the 
71 


Fractal model for complex resistivity \citep{Farias2010,Honig2007}. 
72 



73 



74 


The model is calculated over many frequencyies and transformed to the time 
75 


domain using a discrete fourier transform. 
76 


