1 |
|
2 |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
3 |
% |
4 |
% Copyright (c) 2003-2010 by University of Queensland |
5 |
% Earth Systems Science Computational Center (ESSCC) |
6 |
% http://www.uq.edu.au/esscc |
7 |
% |
8 |
% Primary Business: Queensland, Australia |
9 |
% Licensed under the Open Software License version 3.0 |
10 |
% http://www.opensource.org/licenses/osl-3.0.php |
11 |
% |
12 |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
13 |
|
14 |
In this chapter we will investigate the effects of a current flow and |
15 |
resistivity in a medium. This type of problem is related to the DC resistivity method of |
16 |
geophysical prospecting. Currents are injected into the ground at the surface |
17 |
and measurements of the potential are taken at various potential-dipole |
18 |
locations along or adjacent to the survey line. From these measurements of the |
19 |
potential it is possible to infer an approximate apparent resistivity model of |
20 |
the subsurface. |
21 |
|
22 |
The following theory comes from a tutorial by \citet{Loke2004}. |
23 |
We know from Ohm's law that the current flow in the ground is given in vector |
24 |
form by |
25 |
\begin{equation} |
26 |
\vec{J}=\sigma\vec{E} |
27 |
\end{equation} |
28 |
where $\vec{J}$ is current density, $\vec{E}$ is the electric field intensity |
29 |
and $\sigma$ is the conductivity. We can relate the potential to the electric |
30 |
field intensity by |
31 |
\begin{equation} |
32 |
E=-\nabla\Phi |
33 |
\end{equation} |
34 |
where $\Phi$ is the potential. We now note that the current density is related |
35 |
to the potential via |
36 |
\begin{equation} |
37 |
\vec{J}=-\sigma\nabla\Phi |
38 |
\end{equation} |
39 |
Geophysical surveys predominantly use current sources which individually act as |
40 |
point poles. Considering our model will contain volumes, we can normalise the |
41 |
input current and approximate the current density in a volume $\Delta V$ by |
42 |
\begin{equation} |
43 |
\nabla \vec{J} = |
44 |
\left(\frac{I}{\Delta V} \right) \delta(x-x\hackscore{s}) |
45 |
\delta(y-y\hackscore{s}) |
46 |
\delta(z-z\hackscore{s}) |
47 |
\end{equation} |
48 |
|
49 |
\begin{equation} |
50 |
-\nabla \cdot \left[ \sigma(x,y,z) \nabla \phi (x,y,z) \right] = |
51 |
\left(\frac{I}{\Delta V} \right) \delta(x-x\hackscore{s}) |
52 |
\delta(y-y\hackscore{s}) |
53 |
\delta(z-z\hackscore{s}) |
54 |
\end{equation} |
55 |
|
56 |
This form is quite simple to solve in \esc. |
57 |
|
58 |
\section{3D Current-Dipole Potential} |
59 |
\sslist{example11m.py; example11c.py} |
60 |
|
61 |
\begin{figure}[ht] |
62 |
\centering |
63 |
\includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{figures/ex11cstreamline.png} |
64 |
\caption{Current Density Model for layered medium.} |
65 |
\label{fig:ex11cstream} |
66 |
\end{figure} |
67 |
|
68 |
\section{Frequency Dependent Resistivity - Induced Polarisation} |
69 |
With a more complicated resistivity model it is possible to calculate the |
70 |
chargeability or IP effect in the model. A recent development has been the |
71 |
Fractal model for complex resistivity \citep{Farias2010,Honig2007}. |
72 |
|
73 |
|
74 |
The model is calculated over many frequencyies and transformed to the time |
75 |
domain using a discrete fourier transform. |
76 |
|