--- trunk/doc/inversion/CookGravity.tex 2013/03/07 01:08:43 4285 +++ trunk/doc/inversion/CookGravity.tex 2013/03/07 04:28:11 4286 @@ -758,79 +758,3 @@ \end{verbatim} would lead to the same regularization as the statement above. -% -% \section{Reference} -% -% There are three examples for 2D and 3D gravity inversions with artificial input data. -% In first step, an area with synthetic density section was suggested. Then based on forward modeling its gravitational data was collected. Afterwards with generated gravity data, escripts simulated a volume of inverted density. Whilst new density mass could be compared with the synthetic density section to verify the inversion. -% -% Some of the presumptions were the same for all of the examples to simplify the situation to make a logical comparison between synthetic input and output. which is as followed: -% -% \begin{verbatim} -% n_cells_in_data=100 -% depth_offset=0.*U.km -% l_data = 100 * U.km -% l_pad=40*U.km -% THICKNESS=20.*U.km -% l_air=6*U.km -% \end{verbatim} -% -% The others assumptions comes with each examples. -% \begin{enumerate} -% \item A 2D density section with a maximum in center was assumed. The reference density and inverted will be shown. The padding area is excluded. (\ref{fig:gravity2D1}) -% -% \begin{verbatim} -% n_cells_in_data=100 -% n_humbs_h= 1 -% n_humbs_v=1 -% mu=100 -% \end{verbatim} -% -% \begin{figure} -% \centering -% \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{grav2D1.png} -% \caption{2D density model up) reference down) result} -% \label{fig:gravity2D1} -% \end{figure} -% -% -% \item A 2D density properties with two maximum in corners and one minimum in the center was inverted. The result have eliminated the effects in padding area.(\ref{fig:gravity2D3}) -% -% \begin{verbatim} -% n_cells_in_data=100 -% n_humbs_h= 3 -% n_humbs_v=1 -% mu=100 -% \end{verbatim} -% -% \begin{figure} -% \centering -% \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{grav2D3.png} -% \caption{2D density model up) reference down) result} -% \label{fig:gravity2D3} -% \end{figure} -% -% \item A 3D model with a maximum in the center was used as input data and the result after simulation in shown in the next image which determined a good distribution of density through the model in the main area.(\ref{fig:gravity3D} and \ref{fig:gravity3D1}) -% -% \begin{verbatim} -% n_cells_in_data=50 -% n_humbs_h= 1 -% n_humbs_v=1 -% mu=10 -% \end{verbatim} -% -% \begin{figure} -% \centering -% \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{density3D-ref.png} -% \caption{3D density model of reference as synthetic data} -% \label{fig:gravity3D} -% \end{figure} -% -% \begin{figure} -% \centering -% \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{gravity3D.png} -% \caption{3D density model of result} -% \label{fig:gravity3D1} -% \end{figure} -% \end{enumerate} -