 Diff of /trunk/doc/user/darcyflux.tex

revision 3568 by gross, Tue Aug 30 08:23:24 2011 UTC revision 3569 by gross, Thu Sep 1 02:42:36 2011 UTC
# Line 90  u_{k,k} = f & \mbox{ on } & \Gamma_{D} \ Line 90  u_{k,k} = f & \mbox{ on } & \Gamma_{D} \
90  Notice that the second condition is a natural boundary condition.  Notice that the second condition is a natural boundary condition.
91  Global post-processing is more expense than direct pressure evaluation  Global post-processing is more expense than direct pressure evaluation
92  however the flux is more accurate and asymptotic incompressibility  however the flux is more accurate and asymptotic incompressibility
93  for mesh size towards zero can be shown (if $\omega>0$).  for mesh size towards zero can be shown, if $\omega>0$.
94
95
96  \subsection{Functions}  \subsection{Functions}
# Line 107  If \var{verbose} is set some information Line 107  If \var{verbose} is set some information
107  flux is calculated directly from pressure evaluation, see section~\ref{SEC DARCY SIMPLE}.  flux is calculated directly from pressure evaluation, see section~\ref{SEC DARCY SIMPLE}.
108  \end{memberdesc}  \end{memberdesc}
109
110    \begin{memberdesc}[DarcyFlow]{SMOOTH}
111    solver using global post-processing of flux with weighting factor $\omega=0$, see section~\ref{SEC DARCY POST}.
112    \end{memberdesc}
113
114  \begin{memberdesc}[DarcyFlow]{POST}  \begin{memberdesc}[DarcyFlow]{POST}
115  solver using global post-processing of flux, see section~\ref{SEC DARCY POST}.  solver using global post-processing of flux, see section~\ref{SEC DARCY POST}.
116  \end{memberdesc}  \end{memberdesc}

Legend:
 Removed from v.3568 changed lines Added in v.3569